12 Kids or Infertile
Would you rather have a dozen kids or be infertile?
Considerations:
- You cannot adobt, kidnap, or otherwise obtain children.
- The dozen children would be born within a 15 year span.
- Lots of kids might drive you insane.
- No kids might make you sad.
posted by Hypotheticon @ Sunday, March 26, 2006
7 Comments:
12 kids.....and then I'd be mental and I wouldn't even notice...I'd probably think they were all cats or something
thats a tough one, but i'd go for no kids. my great grandma had 16!
I'll take the kids! If I had them young then I could still have lots of fun/time later. If I had them as an older person I'd have company in my old age. Is this the same for everyone in the World? ...So lots of large families and lots of infertile folk....another division in society or lots of babysitters...? Large families are great... as long as the parents are decent having lots of kids is more rewarding than just having a couple ..better for kids too.
I want a bunch of kids anyways .. not QUITE tweleve.. but it's better than being infertile I guess...
Infertile is obviously better. 12 kids would drive me insane. Infertile sort of relates to the slut question (no pregnancies there!). And there are millions of children in need of adoptive parents if you want kids later.
This is an easy choice for me!!! I want a huge family anyway, so I'll take the kids. I'd probably adopt 8 more to make it 20.
Have 12 kids and give away 10 to rich infertile people for adoption (in return for "care giving" costs :-))
Raise the remaining two on that money. And spend the rest of my life replying to the "Ridiculous Hypotheticals" :-)
Post a Comment
<< Home